Role of Credit Card Companies in the Interchange Fee Settlement

Role of Credit Card Companies in the Interchange Fee Settlement

Visa, MasterCard, and 13 banks have reached a proposed settlement in an antitrust class action lawsuit that alleged they conspired to set the prices merchants pay for processing Visa and MasterCard transactions. This agreement, which aims to resolve nearly two decades of litigation, is valued at approximately $5.54 billion. However, the question remains regarding the role of credit card companies in the Interchange Fee Settlement. Let’s explore this further!

The plaintiffs’ attorneys hailed this as a significant triumph for American consumers. Merchants who processed Visa and Mastercard credit card payments from January 2004 to January 2019 can SUBMIT A CLAIM before the deadline (August 30, 2024) passes.

Understanding the Role of Credit Card Companies in the Interchange Fee Settlement

start your claim now

Visa, Mastercard, and other banks have played a pivotal role in the Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation due to their substantial control over interchange fees. These fees, charged to merchants for accepting credit card payments, became the center of legal scrutiny as the companies were accused of conspiring to set and inflate them.

To clarify, credit card companies such as Visa and Mastercard and banks like Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., and JPMorgan Chase & Co. collect interchange fees from merchants whenever a customer pays using a credit card. These fees, often called swipe fees, are meant to cover the costs of processing and authorizing the transactions. Set by payment networks like Visa and Mastercard, these fees are generally fixed and non-negotiable, posing a significant financial burden on merchants.

The lawsuit stems from the transaction process initiated when a consumer uses a Visa or MasterCard for a purchase and ends when the consumer pays the credit card bill issued by the card’s issuing bank. Initially, the consumer’s purchase binds them to pay the price, a responsibility first held by the merchant. Instead of collecting directly from the consumer, the merchant sells this collection right to an acquiring bank, generally receiving between 97% and 98.5% of the purchase price. Swipe fees rank as the third largest expense for many small retailers, after rent and payroll.

The acquiring bank then sells the right to collect the consumer’s payment to Visa or MasterCard at a marginally higher price, yet still below the total payment owed by the consumer. Subsequently, Visa or MasterCard passes on this right to the financial institution that issued the card to the consumer, charging slightly more but remaining under the total payment amount. Ultimately, the card issuer bills the consumer for the total amount due, hoping the consumer will pay at least the minimum due.

Throughout this chain, each financial intermediary, including Visa and MasterCard, extracts a portion of the original purchase price. Economic analyses suggest that swipe fees are elevated, encouraging financial institutions to vie for Visa and MasterCard affiliations by offering perks like credit card rewards programs.

Understanding the Economics of the Interchange Charges And Its Effects on Businesses

Interchange Fee Settlement

Interchange fees exist within what is often termed a “two-sided” market, where card payment services only hold value if both consumers and merchants choose to use them. In this market structure, the card payment provider functions as an intermediary between the two parties.

One challenge in a two-sided market is the potential for fewer transactions than optimal. A transaction only happens if it benefits each involved party. Sometimes, even if a transaction would be beneficial overall to society, it may not occur if it adversely affects any party involved. For example, consumers might favor using credit cards for attractive rewards, but it’s the merchants who bear the cost of these benefits.

During the legal dispute covering January 1, 2004, to January 25, 2019, merchants contended that Visa, Mastercard, and their affiliated banks unlawfully established high interchange fees and restrictive conditions for accepting their cards. The merchants argued that these fees were exorbitant and that the rules limited their ability to encourage alternative payment methods without interchange fees, such as cash.

Visa and Mastercard, controlling approximately 75% of the payment-processing market, have been criticized by merchants for setting unnecessarily high swipe fees and creating a duopoly. According to merchants, this dominance not only elevates their costs but also indirectly increases prices for consumers.

It’s crucial to understand that interchange fees are the main source of funding for rebates and rewards offered by credit card programs. Therefore, any reduction or cap on these fees might lead to a decrease in such perks, potentially diminishing customer interest in credit cards. This could pose a financial risk for consumers and ultimately impact the profitability of credit card companies. The financial stakes are significant, and so is the pressure on merchants to accept credit card payments at unreasonable rates: in 2004, card issuers generated roughly $25 billion in revenue from interchange fees. More recently, in 2023, merchants paid Visa $72 billion in interchange fees out of a total of $101 billion. This substantial revenue underscores the importance of interchange fees in the credit card industry.

What Is the Recent Development in the Case?

Understanding the Payment Card Interchange Fee Settlement

So, Visa, MasterCard along with other banks, reached a settlement with US merchants that includes a reduction and cap on credit interchange rates until 2030, alongside greater flexibility for merchants in managing payments and applying surcharges. As part of the settlement, the published interchange rates on Visa and Mastercard’s domestic credit programs are set to decrease by 4 basis points (bps) for three years, beginning in April 2025, with a broader reduction of 7 bps in system-wide credit interchange fees that will last for five years.

Additionally, Mastercard and Visa will lower the posted swipe fees for all merchants by at least 4 bps for a minimum of three years and have agreed not to increase swipe fees above the rates posted at the end of 2023 for five years. The agreement also includes updates to key network rules, enhancing merchants’ ability to accept digital payments.

Conclusion

The settlement involving Visa, MasterCard, and major banks marks a significant resolution in the long-standing interchange fee dispute. Valued at approximately $5.54 billion, the settlement addresses claims that these companies conspired to set high interchange fees. Merchants who processed credit card payments between January 2004 and January 2019 can now claim compensation.

This agreement reduces interchange fees and grants merchants greater flexibility in payment management and surcharges until 2030. While this offers relief to merchants, it could impact the rewards offered to consumers and the profitability of credit card companies. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the broader implications of interchange fees on businesses and consumers alike.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What was the role of Visa and Mastercard in the settlement?

    Visa and Mastercard were central to the settlement, accused of imposing high interchange fees on merchants, violating antitrust laws. They agreed to lower fees and maintain reduced rates, impacting the credit card processing market.

  2. How have Visa and Mastercard adjusted their policies post-settlement?

    Post-settlement, Visa, and Mastercard lowered interchange fees, capped rates for five years, and modified network rules, offering merchants more payment flexibility. These changes aim to provide cost certainty and options at the point-of-sale.

  3. What impact does the settlement have on the credit card fee structure?

    The settlement mandates fee reductions by Visa and Mastercard for at least three years, with no fee increases for up to five years. This could save merchants billions in fees and influence pricing strategies, indirectly affecting consumers.

  4. What are the future implications of this settlement for the payment processing industry?

    The settlement changes interchange economics and promotes industry transparency and flexibility. It may influence how payment processors structure fees and services, creating a more competitive and merchant-friendly environment.

Save Time, Money, & Resources

Categories: Payment Card Settlement Claims

Get Started

Ready for the ultimate credit card processing experience? Fill out this form!

Contact HMS

Ready for the ultimate credit card processing experience? Ask us your questions here.