Patient Financing

How Patient Financing Is Revolutionizing the Healthcare Industry

Healthcare costs in the United States have risen dramatically over recent decades, leaving many patients struggling to afford care. This financial burden has paved the way for patient financing – a range of payment solutions that allow patients to pay medical bills in installments or with specialized credit arrangements. Patient financing is gaining significant traction as a solution to America’s healthcare affordability crisis. It promises to “care now, pay later,” enabling patients to get needed treatment without the hurdle of prohibitive upfront costs.

Roughly 100 million Americans (41% of adults) currently carry healthcare debt, highlighting an enormous need for better payment options. In response, providers, fintech companies, and policymakers are all paying close attention to patient financing’s potential to transform healthcare payments. This can include zero-interest installment plans offered via hospitals, “Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL)” services for medical bills, dedicated medical credit cards, or third-party healthcare loans. By extending payments over time, patient financing offers an alternative to foregoing treatment or facing immediate financial strain.

Traditional Healthcare Payments and Their Challenges

Traditional Healthcare Payments

To appreciate the rise of patient financing, it’s important to understand the traditional landscape of healthcare payments and why it often failed patients and providers alike. Historically, American healthcare relied on a combination of insurance and patient out-of-pocket payments. For decades, insurance covered the majority of costs, and patients paid relatively modest co-pays or deductibles. However, in recent years, there has been a major shift of costs onto patients through high-deductible health plans and rising cost-sharing.

The average cost of employer-based health coverage now exceeds $7,100 per year for an individual (2024 data), and many plans come with deductibles of several thousand dollars. Consequently, patients frequently face large bills that insurance doesn’t fully cover, often $1,000 to $5,000 or more per episode of care. The impact of these high out-of-pocket costs has been severe. Numerous surveys show Americans struggling with medical bills and delaying care due to cost. One in four U.S. adults report skipping or postponing needed healthcare in the past year because of the expense.

Among uninsured adults, this figure is even higher – about 61% avoided care due to cost. Even those with insurance are not immune: over half (57%) of U.S. adults say they’ve had to owe money for medical or dental bills in the past five years. These financial pressures lead many people to deplete savings, rack up credit card debt, or sacrifice other household needs to pay medical bills. In the worst cases, medical debt has been a leading contributor to personal bankruptcy. From the provider’s perspective, traditional payment models have also posed challenges. Hospitals and clinics historically send bills to patients after insurance pays, then must chase payments or send accounts to collections if patients cannot pay. This process is costly and inefficient.

Recent industry data shows that providers typically collect under half (only ~47.6%) of the total amount patients owe; collection rates plummet for larger balances over $5,000. Many physician practices report daily struggles to obtain payments from self-pay patients, with about 29% of practices facing significant challenges collecting from patients. In essence, the traditional “bill me later” approach often results in delayed cash flow for providers, high administrative overhead for billing and collections, and substantial amounts of uncompensated care when patients default.

Another challenge has been the limited options for patients who couldn’t pay a lump sum. Historically, a patient might try to negotiate a payment plan directly with the hospital’s billing department, often an informal, short-term installment arrangement. Some hospitals offered zero-interest payment plans internally, but these were usually capped at 6–12 months and not widely advertised. For larger or elective expenses (e.g., elective surgery, dental work), patients sometimes turned to general credit cards or personal loans, which could carry high interest rates. Traditional medical billing thus left a gap: patients needing longer-term, affordable financing didn’t have great alternatives, leading to delayed treatment, missed revenue for providers, and mounting debt. These shortcomings set the stage for innovative financing solutions to emerge.

Patient Financing Solutions: Types and Examples

Patient Financing Solutions

Today’s patient financing landscape is diverse, with solutions ranging from tech-enabled point-of-sale loan platforms to specialized healthcare credit cards. Below are the major types of patient financing available and how each works:

  • Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) for Healthcare:

BNPL has swept through retail and is now entering healthcare. These services (offered by fintechs like Affirm, Afterpay, Sunbit, and others) let patients split medical bills into a series of equal payments, often over a few months to a couple of years. BNPL is typically offered at the point of service or via an online bill, giving patients a quick approval for installment payments. Affirm, for example, partners with healthcare organizations to embed a payment option allowing patients to “split your bill” at checkout. Patients might pay 25% upfront and the rest over 3, 6, or 12 months, sometimes with zero or low interest.

A key selling point is transparency – Affirm advertises no late fees and no compound interest (only simple interest if any). BNPL appeals especially to younger patients who may avoid traditional credit cards but want a budgeting tool for health expenses. It’s being used for everything from routine doctor visits to elective surgeries, with companies like Affirm even partnering with platforms like GoodRx and pharmacies to help finance prescriptions.

  • Medical Credit Cards:

These are credit cards specifically designed for healthcare expenses (e.g., CareCredit by Synchrony Bank, Cherry for cosmetic procedures). They are often marketed in doctors’ or dentists’ offices as a quick way to pay a bill. Medical credit cards usually offer a promotional “deferred interest” period – for example, no interest if paid in full within 6, 12, or 18 months. However, if the balance isn’t paid off by then, interest from the original charge date kicks in (a potentially hefty retroactive charge).

The typical APR on medical credit cards is around 26.99% – significantly higher than the ~16% average APR on general credit cards. These cards were initially used mainly for elective treatments not covered by insurance (like LASIK, cosmetic dentistry, or veterinary care), but in recent years have been offered more broadly for basic and emergency care as well. Millions of patients have signed up for products like CareCredit in clinics nationwide. While they can provide immediate relief (no upfront payment), the high interest rates and complex terms have drawn scrutiny (more on that in the regulatory section).

Still, medical cards remain popular for those who need a revolving credit line dedicated to health expenses. Notably, Synchrony’s CareCredit has been a market leader, accepted at over 250,000 providers across the U.S., covering dental, vision, veterinary, and more.

  • Third-Party Financing Platforms:

Beyond BNPL and credit cards, several fintech and healthtech companies now specialize in patient financing loans and payment plans. These include startups like PayZen, Walnut, AccessOne, Scratchpay, Prosper Healthcare Lending, LendingClub Patient Solutions, and others. Their models vary: some offer no-interest or low-interest installment loans tailored to a patient’s budget, often using advanced algorithms to underwrite risk.

For instance, PayZen extends personalized payment plans and even issues a special debit card that patients can use to pay medical bills, effectively turning large bills into affordable monthly payments. PayZen’s approach is to use AI-driven underwriting to create “bespoke” plans that lower-income patients can afford, thereby improving the chances the provider gets paid in full. Importantly, PayZen and some peers charge no interest or fees to patients – instead, their revenue comes from the provider’s side (the hospital might pay a fee or agree to a slight discount on bills in exchange for the financing service).

This makes financing effectively free for patients in need. Other platforms like AccessOne or CarePayment similarly partner with hospitals to offer zero-interest, long-term payment programs – often marketed as compassion-driven programs to help patients while improving collections. These third-party platforms can handle billing, collections, and patient outreach, easing administrative burdens on healthcare providers.

With fintech backing, they often have the scalability and risk management expertise that individual hospitals lack. As a result, many providers choose to outsource patient financing to specialist firms rather than manage in-house payment plans. In fact, one 2022 survey of hospital executives found that 61% expect to increase their use of third-party patient financing partners in the next two years.

  • Provider-Based Installment Plans:

Many healthcare providers still offer their payment plans, especially for smaller bills or short-term arrangements. These can range from an informal agreement with a billing office to structured zero-interest installment programs.

Historically, nonprofit hospitals have also provided financial assistance or charity care to those who qualify, but for the underinsured who don’t qualify as indigent, a payment plan might be the main option. Typically, hospital-based plans require a portion of the bill upfront and the rest paid over 6–12 months. The limitation, as noted earlier, is that providers usually cannot extend low-cost financing beyond a year or so, since they are not lenders by trade. Still, some innovative health systems have built robust in-house financing.

The Role of Fintech and Healthtech Platforms

A crucial driver of the patient financing boom is the rise of fintech and healthtech innovators bringing modern technology to an old problem. Healthcare payments and revenue cycle management have traditionally been fragmented and paper-based (say, mailed bills and phone calls for collections).

Fintech companies saw an opportunity to modernize this by applying the same user-friendly payment tech used in retail and banking. Several trends show how fintech/healthtech platforms are enabling modern patient financing:

  • Digital Integration:

New platforms integrate directly with hospital billing systems, electronic health records (EHRs), or patient portals. This means that when a patient gets a bill or an upfront cost estimate, they can see financing options instantly.

For example, Affirm’s healthcare solution can be added as a simple checkout method on a provider’s payment page, with minimal disruption to existing processes. This embedded finance approach makes patient financing a seamless part of the care experience, rather than an afterthought.

  • Real-time Approval and Underwriting:

Fintech lenders leverage advanced algorithms, credit data, and even machine learning to approve patients for financing in minutes or seconds. Traditional hospital payment plans might require a phone call or office visit to set up, but fintech platforms offer instant decisions. Affirm, for instance, performs a real-time soft credit check and risk assessment for each transaction at the point of purchase.

This lets patients know immediately what installment terms they qualify for, mirroring the convenience of online retail checkout. Walnut, another healthcare BNPL startup, claims to use data science to underwrite patients quickly and extend loans even to those with modest credit, expanding access. Such tech-driven underwriting can increase approval rates while managing risk, something hospitals alone struggled to do.

  • Personalized Payment Plans:

One major advantage of fintech-driven financing is the ability to tailor repayment to the individual’s situation. AI and data analytics allow platforms to predict what a patient can afford monthly and structure the plan accordingly. PayZen exemplifies this by analyzing a patient’s financial data (with permission) to design a plan that might span, say, 24 months at $150/month, instead of a generic 6-month plan that the patient may default on.

This personalization makes repayment more realistic, improving outcomes for both patient and provider. This model increases the likelihood of fully collecting the debt because the payments fit the patient’s budget

  • Mobile and User-Friendly Experience:

Healthtech apps make it easy for patients to manage their payments, see their balance, or even finance additional procedures on the same plan. Many platforms provide mobile apps or web dashboards where patients can track their payment progress. For example, AccessOne offers a MobilePay app to manage hospital payment plans. The emphasis is on consumer-friendly design – clear terms, simple interfaces, and communication via text/email – which improves patient engagement in paying off bills.

This tech-savvy approach is critical because younger, digitally native patients expect a retail-like experience in healthcare payments. Indeed, only about 42% of healthcare executives are satisfied with their current patient payment solutions, and many are seeking more modern, streamlined technologies to meet patient expectations.

  • Partnering with Providers and Insurers:

Fintech companies often partner with multiple stakeholders in the health system. Some integrate with insurance companies or employer benefits platforms to offer financing as part of coverage. Others work directly with providers.

Additionally, an emerging trend is the use of embedded credit lines that can cover a patient’s expenses across multiple visits or providers. Zero-interest rate lines of credit that stay open for additional charges have been well received by patients as they allow ongoing flexibility without repeated loan applications.

Patient Financing Impact on Patients: Access and Outcomes

Patient Financing Impact

One of the most profound effects of patient financing has been on healthcare access and patient outcomes. By reducing the immediate cost barrier, financing options can help more people obtain timely care. Several data points and examples illustrate these benefits:

  • Reduced Delays in Care:

When patients can pay over time, they are less likely to delay or skip treatment due to cost. As noted earlier, a quarter of Americans have postponed care because they couldn’t afford it upfront. Offering financing can directly address this. A representative from Affirm observed that once a payment plan was available, many patients proceeded with needed procedures they would have otherwise deferred.

In other words, financing can turn a “maybe later” into a “yes” for critical health services. This has a cascading benefit: earlier intervention can prevent conditions from worsening. For example, a patient who is able to finance a $5,000 surgery today (at perhaps $200 per month over two years) can avoid the higher costs and complications of delaying that surgery. Clinicians frequently see better outcomes when care isn’t put off; by removing cost as an immediate barrier, patient financing contributes to healthier patients in the long run.

  • Higher Treatment Adherence:

Financing options also encourage patients to follow through with full treatment plans rather than opting out midway for financial reasons. In practices offering payment plans, patients are more likely to agree to recommended add-on treatments, rehabilitation, or follow-up visits, knowing they won’t need to pay all at once. This leads to more comprehensive care. An elective healthcare provider reported that more patients opt for complete elective procedures when financing is available – for instance, a dental patient might proceed with a full multi-tooth implant plan instead of only extracting the worst tooth, improving their overall oral health.

Similarly, chronic disease management improves if patients can finance things like insulin pumps or physical therapy that they might not afford in a single payment.

  • Patient Satisfaction and Peace of Mind:

From the patient’s perspective, having financing as an option can greatly improve the healthcare experience. Financial stress is a huge component of patient anxiety – surveys show large portions of older adults are “very concerned” about medical costs. Providing a way to manage those costs via installments can relieve anxiety.

Patients often express appreciation when a provider helps them find an affordable way to pay, rather than just sending a bill. Offering financing sends a message that “we care about your needs beyond the clinical – we want to help you manage the financial aspect too.” This can boost trust and loyalty. Indeed, practices that rolled out formal patient financing programs report higher patient satisfaction and retention. Patients value the convenience and “peace of mind” it gives them. They feel their provider is not putting their needs on the back burner, which fosters goodwill.

A positive financial experience often translates to better overall ratings for the hospital or clinic. In an era where patients increasingly act like consumers – comparing providers and reading reviews – having flexible payment options can even be a competitive advantage.

  • Improved Financial Well-Being:

While taking on any debt is not ideal, patient financing can actually leave individuals in a better financial position compared to alternatives. For example, using a regulated installment plan with simple interest could cost far less in interest than racking up charges on a traditional credit card. The average American spends about $1,400 out-of-pocket on healthcare annually, and roughly half carry a balance on credit cards, incurring compounding interest.

The compound interest on a $1,400 medical expense could add around $308 (22% more) in costs if put on a credit card for a year. In contrast, an installment plan like Affirm’s (with no compounding and transparent terms) would charge roughly half that in interest, or even 0% if a promotional no-interest term is offered.

Over time, this means patients pay less in interest and fees, keeping more money in their pockets. Additionally, by avoiding default or collections (thanks to affordable payment plans), patients protect their credit scores and financial health. Medical debt sent to collections can damage credit, making other loans (auto, home) more expensive; financing plans can avert that outcome by providing a structured path to payoff. In essence, responsible patient financing can be a financial safety valve, preventing medical bills from snowballing into long-term debt traps.

Impact on Providers: Revenue Cycle and Cash Flow

For healthcare providers – whether large hospital systems or small practices – patient financing can be transformative for financial performance. By addressing the patient affordability problem, providers in turn see improvements in their revenue cycle metrics and overall cash flow:

  • Higher Collection Rates:

As noted earlier, providers historically recover barely half of patient balances. By introducing financing options, they can capture revenue that might otherwise be written off as bad debt. Patients offered a zero-interest payment plan, for example, are much more likely to pay their bill over time than if left to struggle with a lump sum. One health system executive summarized the goal as balancing “accelerating cash flow and reducing bad debt with offering excellent service and flexible payment options.”

The end result of that balance is more revenue collected. Real-world cases back this up: when Floyd Medical Center outsourced to a patient financing program, it saw reduced accounts receivable and improved cash flow – meaning money came in faster and fewer bills languished unpaid. Deaconess Health’s no-interest program similarly cut down their internal patient debt and delinquent accounts markedly. These outcomes show financing isn’t just a nicety; it directly impacts the bottom line by converting would-be debt into received payments.

  • Faster Payments and Cash Upfront:

Many third-party financing arrangements pay the provider upfront (or very quickly) and then take on the task of collecting from the patient over time. For instance, in typical BNPL models like Affirm’s, the healthcare provider receives the full bill amount (minus a merchant fee) from the BNPL company, and the company assumes the risk of the patient’s installment payments. This means immediate cash for the provider at the time of service.

Even in programs where the hospital itself carries the payment plan, having structured payments in place reduces the lag between service and cash receipt. Cash flow consistency improves, which is crucial for hospitals operating on thin margins. In a post-pandemic era where margins are recovering but still below pre-2020 levels for many hospitals, any boost in timely collections is valuable.

  • Reduced Administrative Burden:

Patient financing programs often come with administrative support. When third-party vendors are involved, they handle the billing statements, payment processing, and customer service for payment plans. This relieves the provider’s billing staff from those duties. Even in-house programs that use software or fintech tools can automate payment scheduling and reminders. The result is fewer staff hours spent on collections calls or managing accounts receivable. Hospitals also avoid the costly process of debt collections or legal actions for unpaid bills.

By ensuring patients have a plan from the start, there are fewer accounts that go into default or require collections agencies. Additionally, providers can avoid awkward financial conversations during clinical encounters – instead of front-desk staff acting as debt collectors, they can offer a constructive solution (financing) at check-in or checkout. This improves the overall patient-provider relationship and frees up staff to focus on care and service, not just payments.

  • Increased Patient Volume and Loyalty:

There is a strategic upside for providers who embrace patient financing – it can attract and retain patients. A healthcare consumer faced with a major procedure might choose the hospital that offers a reasonable payment plan over one that demands full payment upfront. In competitive elective markets (fertility, cosmetic surgery, etc.), offering financing is almost a must to capture business.

Even for general hospitals, being known for patient-friendly billing (which includes payment plans and financial assistance) can enhance reputation. Patients who have a good experience paying their last bill are less hesitant to return for future care. This translates to better continuity of care and potentially more revenue from returning patients. With patients acting more like shoppers – over 70% of people read online reviews before picking a provider – financial experience can influence those reviews. A comment like “the billing office helped set up an affordable payment plan” can set a provider apart. Thus, financing options become part of a patient satisfaction and retention strategy, not just a financial tactic.

  • Better Alignment with Value-Based Care Goals:

As healthcare shifts toward value-based care (rewarding outcomes, not volume), providers are incentivized to ensure patients get necessary care (to prevent costly complications down the line). Patient financing can support these goals by removing financial barriers to adherence. For example, a value-focused health system wants a diabetic patient to get their insulin and check-ups rather than skip them and end up hospitalized.

By offering that patient an easy financing plan for their out-of-pocket costs, the system increases the likelihood of compliance and avoids worse outcomes. In this way, financing can indirectly contribute to quality metrics and cost savings in population health management.

In aggregate, patient financing is revolutionizing the provider revenue cycle by combining financial compassion with smarter financial strategy. Providers who innovate in payments see tangible improvements in both financial health and patient relations. No wonder, then, that a majority of healthcare finance leaders plan to expand these programs: one study at the start of 2023 found 61% of hospital and group practice leaders expect increased reliance on third-party financing options in the next two years. Flexible patient payments are becoming a standard part of provider strategy.

Patient Financing Regulatory and Compliance Considerations

The rapid growth of patient financing has not escaped the notice of regulators and consumer advocates. Whenever financial products are being offered to consumers, especially vulnerable patients under duress, there are compliance issues and risks to manage. Key considerations include:

  • High Interest and Predatory Practices:

Regulators are scrutinizing products that may exploit patients. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in particular, has raised alarms about medical credit cards and certain loans. In a May 2023 report, the CFPB highlighted that many patients paid over $1 billion in deferred interest on medical financing from 2018 to 2020. Those deferred interest deals (common with medical credit cards) can inflate a patient’s medical bill by nearly 25% once the deferred interest is added.

This has led to calls for tighter regulation of promotional financing that carries high APRs or harsh penalties. The Biden administration in 2023 went so far as to caution consumers against using medical credit cards unless necessary. There is momentum for possible rules to ban deferred interest in healthcare or require clearer disclosures. Lenders may soon face limits on how they market these products in medical settings, ensuring patients aren’t misled by “no interest” offers that later balloon.

  • Consumer Protection and Transparency:

Healthcare patients often are in stressful situations and may not comparison-shop financial terms like they would for a car loan. This puts the onus on providers and financing companies to ensure transparency and fairness. Truth-in-Lending laws and fair credit regulations do apply, meaning patients should receive clear disclosures of interest rates, payment schedules, and any fees. Compliance involves treating financing offers not as an afterthought but as a formal part of the financial consent process.

For instance, if a hospital offers a payment plan or credit card application at the point of care, they must train staff to explain it properly and not steer patients away from other options (like charity care, if the patient might qualify). The CFPB, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Treasury launched an inquiry in 2023 into high-cost medical financing practices, signaling that more guidance is likely forthcoming on how these products can be offered. One concern is that patients might be enrolling in financing when they could be eligible for hospital financial assistance programs that forgive some bills. Regulators want to ensure financing isn’t replacing charity care for those who truly can’t afford to pay.

  • Data Privacy and Security:

Fintech-based financing platforms handle sensitive personal and financial data, often including health information. They must comply with laws like HIPAA (if handling protected health info in the process of billing) and robust cybersecurity standards.

As patient financing gets more digitized, platforms will need to safeguard patient data and be transparent about data use – especially if AI algorithms are crunching personal financial info to underwrite loans. Any data breaches or misuse could invite regulatory penalties and erode trust.

  • Equal Access and Non-Discrimination:

Lenders have to be careful to follow fair lending laws, ensuring they do not discriminate (even unintentionally) based on race, gender, age, etc. Use of advanced algorithms in underwriting has raised questions in other industries about potential bias. In healthcare financing, companies will need to monitor their models for compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). Additionally, hospitals must ensure that the availability of financing doesn’t inadvertently create disparities – for example, if only certain patients are offered financing while others are sent to collections.

To comply with IRS rules for non-profit hospitals, they must make reasonable efforts to determine if a patient qualifies for financial assistance before engaging in extraordinary collection actions. Offering a high-interest loan without checking if the patient could get charity care could be seen as a compliance issue in that context.

  • State Regulations and Licensing:

Patient financing can fall under various state lending laws. Companies providing these loans or credit may need lender licenses in each state, and they must abide by state interest rate caps or consumer protection statutes. Some states have strict rules on medical debt collection and may impose additional requirements on how payment plans are administered (for instance, California has laws capping interest on some medical debt repayment plans, and New York passed a law in 2022 prohibiting healthcare providers from garnishing wages or placing liens on primary residences for medical debt).

All these intersecting regulations mean providers and their financing partners must maintain compliance teams to navigate the legal landscape.

In light of these concerns, many industry experts advocate for “patient-friendly financing” principles: low or zero interest, no hidden fees, and clear communication. There’s also discussion that BNPL in healthcare should be regulated like credit if it isn’t already, to ensure consistency and consumer safety. The CFPB has already termed the trend the “financialization of healthcare,” noting it has led to a surge of consumer complaints about aggressive medical debt collection.

Policymakers are keen to avoid a future where hospitals overly rely on loans that could burden patients. So while patient financing is indeed revolutionary, it will likely evolve under tighter oversight to ensure it truly benefits patients without unintended harm. Providers implementing these programs should proactively work within guidelines – for example, favoring 0% interest plans and being transparent – to stay on the right side of regulators and maintain patient trust.

How Patient Financing May Evolve?

Looking forward 5–10 years, patient financing is poised to become an even more integral part of the healthcare ecosystem, albeit with important evolutions. Here’s a forward-looking view of what we might expect:

1. Mainstream Adoption

Shortly, it’s likely that the majority of healthcare providers will offer some kind of patient financing by default. Just as most providers today accept credit cards, by 2030, most may have partnerships with financing platforms or in-house programs. The convenience and demand from patients will make it a standard offering. We can expect tighter integration at all points of care – for example, when patients receive a cost estimate before a procedure (as required by price transparency rules), a financing quote might be presented side by side with insurance information.

The fact that currently only ~45% of hospitals with financing allow patients to apply pre-service (before care is delivered) indicates a growth opportunity. In the coming years, that number should climb, so patients can arrange payment plans in advance and proceed to care with confidence about affordability.

2. Enhanced Technology and Personalization

The next decade will bring even more sophisticated use of technology in patient financing. Artificial intelligence and financial data modeling will further refine how payment plans are tailored. We might see AI virtual assistants guiding patients through financing options, or algorithms that adjust a payment plan dynamically if a patient’s financial situation changes. Fintech companies could leverage larger data sets (with privacy safeguards) to predict risk with greater accuracy, allowing them to extend financing to more patients while keeping default rates low.

Real-time eligibility checks could integrate with insurance claims – for instance, as soon as insurance processes a claim and leaves a $2,000 patient balance, a system might auto-generate a financing offer to cover that balance, sent to the patient’s smartphone immediately. This kind of responsiveness could make the billing process far less daunting for patients.

3. Greater Collaboration with Insurers and Employers

We may see health insurance plans and employers incorporate patient financing into their benefits structure. For example, an insurance company might partner with a financing firm to offer 0% financing on any out-of-pocket costs above a certain threshold for its members, essentially as a safety net. Employers could offer medical financing as part of employee wellness programs – perhaps helping subsidize interest or guaranteeing loans for their employees’ medical bills.

Such hybrid models could spread costs and risks in new ways. Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) might also tie in – using HSA funds to automatically pay down financed amounts, etc. The silo between insurance and financing could blur, resulting in a more holistic approach to covering healthcare expenses.

4. Regulatory Framework and Standardization

By 5–10 years out, we will likely have a clearer regulatory framework governing patient financing. This could include formal rules from CFPB that eliminate the most predatory practices (e.g., banning deferred interest or capping APRs for medical loans). There might be industry standards or certifications for “patient-friendly” financing programs. Hospitals may be required to present financing as one of several options (along with checking for financial assistance eligibility) to ensure informed choices.

It’s also possible that credit reporting agencies and regulators will adapt to consider medical payment plans differently, perhaps shielding patients from credit score damage as long as they’re in a payment plan. Some states might establish public or nonprofit medical loan programs to compete with private lenders, ensuring access to low-cost financing for vulnerable populations.

5. Focus on Equity and Inclusion

The future will also hopefully address the current disparities in medical debt. Financing products could be tailored to reach underserved communities who suffer disproportionately from high medical costs. For instance, fintechs might partner with community health centers to offer culturally sensitive financing options with multilingual support.

There may be innovation around micro-loans or “nano-payments” for healthcare, allowing even small expenses (like a $100 clinic visit) to be split into $10/month if needed, thereby leaving no patient behind. In 10 years, we might look back at 2020s’ medical debt statistics, with tens of millions in debt, as something that improved thanks to a combination of better insurance coverage and widely available financing tools for the remaining gaps.

6. Integration with Value-Based Care and Prevention

Another possible evolution is integrating financing into preventive care incentives. For example, a financing plan might include forgiveness of certain payments if a patient completes preventive programs or manages their chronic condition well (akin to loan forgiveness programs). This could align financial incentives with health outcomes in creative ways.

Additionally, healthcare providers might use financing data to identify when patients are struggling (missed payments could flag a need for social worker outreach or financial counseling). In this sense, patient financing programs might double as early warning systems to trigger additional support for patients in financial or health distress.

Conclusion

Patient financing has already begun to revolutionize the healthcare industry by bridging the long-standing gap between rising medical costs and patients’ ability to pay. It offers a lifeline for patients to access care without delay and for providers to maintain financial stability. As we move forward, the key will be nurturing this innovation responsibly – leveraging technology and partnerships to expand access, while enacting smart regulations to protect patients from potential downsides.

If done right, the next 5–10 years will see patient financing evolve from a relatively new concept into a standard, well-regulated facet of healthcare, contributing to a system where financial considerations are less of a barrier to good health. The ultimate vision is a healthcare industry where no patient has to choose between their health and their financial well-being – a vision that patient financing is helping to make a reality, one payment plan at a time.

Save Time, Money, & Resources

Categories: Healthcare

Get Started

Ready for the ultimate credit card processing experience? Fill out this form!

Contact HMS

Ready for the ultimate credit card processing experience? Ask us your questions here.