Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has agreed to pay over $50 million to settle a prolonged investigation into its credit-card partnership. This decision comes after the leading U.S. consumer protection agency found that the company provided misleading information to customers and did not correctly handle disputes.
The Goldman Sachs CFPB probe mentions that customer service failures and false statements impacted thousands of customers. The regulatory scrutiny focused primarily on Goldman Sachs’ operations related to its Apple credit card venture.
Key Takeaways
- Settlement and Financial Penalties: Goldman Sachs agreed to pay over $50 million, including $19.8 million to compensate customers and a $45 million civil penalty, highlighting the financial risks associated with compliance failures in consumer finance.
- Regulatory Violations and Consumer Impact: The CFPB found that Goldman Sachs and Apple misled Apple Card users on interest-free payment plans and failed to properly handle transaction disputes, affecting thousands of customers and damaging credit reports in some cases.
- Technological and Operational Failures: Despite warnings about system flaws, Goldman Sachs and Apple launched the Apple Card without fully functional dispute management systems, leading to unresolved disputes and customer frustration.
- Broader Implications for Banking and Payment Systems: The case underscores the need for strict regulatory compliance, effective dispute resolution, and clear communication in banking and payment systems to maintain consumer trust and avoid regulatory action.
CFPB Orders Goldman Sachs and Apple to Compensate Apple Card Users Over Misleading Practices and Service Failures
Last month, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took measures against Goldman Sachs and Apple due to customer service failures and misleading statements that affected thousands of Apple Card users. The CFPB found that Apple did not provide Goldman Sachs with many customer complaints about Apple Card payments. Goldman Sachs frequently disregarded several federal regulations while resolving complaints referred to them.
Despite earlier warnings from external parties about technical issues in the Apple Card’s dispute system, Goldman Sachs and Apple proceeded with the launch. This resulted in substantial delays for customers seeking to resolve contested charges, with some customers experiencing incorrect derogatory marks on their credit reports.
As a result, during a CFPB investigation into Goldman Sachs, the company was ordered to pay at least $19.8 million in compensation to impacted customers and a $45 million civil penalty. Apple received a $25 million fine. Additionally, the CFPB has barred Goldman Sachs from releasing any new credit cards until it proves that the products meet legal requirements.
The CFPB began investigating Goldman Sachs’s credit card practices in 2022. According to the investigation, Goldman Sachs and Apple misrepresented interest-free payment plans for Apple products.
Image source
Many customers were charged interest when they bought Apple devices with their Apple Card, in contrast to their expectations of automated interest-free payments. In certain instances, some browsers did not display the option for interest-free payments on Apple’s website. Additionally, Goldman Sachs gave incorrect information about refund applications, causing some consumers to incur extra interest charges.
CFPB Director Rohit Chopra stated that Goldman Sachs and Apple had violated their legal responsibilities to Apple Card users. He emphasized that large technology firms and major financial institutions are not above the law. The CFPB has now restricted Goldman Sachs from issuing a new consumer credit card until it can prove its ability to comply with legal standards.
A representative for Goldman Sachs stated that the bank has resolved the technological and operational issues it encountered following the launch and has already rectified these issues with the affected customers. The representative also expressed satisfaction with the settlement reached with the CFPB.
An Apple spokesperson noted that the company collaborated with Goldman Sachs to rectify the problems and assist impacted customers. In a written statement, the spokesperson from Apple mentioned that although they fundamentally disagree with the CFPB’s depiction of Apple’s actions, they have agreed to a settlement.
Background, Challenges, and Missteps in the Apple Card Partnership Between Goldman Sachs and Apple
In August 2019, Apple collaborated with Goldman Sachs to launch the Apple Card, a significant step into consumer finance for both entities. This partnership aimed to offer a new financing option to boost sales of Apple products, such as iPhones and iPads while encouraging increased spending at Apple retail stores and the App Store.
Having ventured into consumer finance in 2016 with its Marcus brand, Goldman Sachs saw the partnership with Apple Card as an opportunity to enter the consumer credit card market. Goldman Sachs provided credit and managed accounts. Meanwhile, Apple was responsible for developing the interfaces on its devices for Apple Card account management, including features like the “Report an Issue” option that allows users to dispute transactions. Apple also took a central role in the card marketing efforts.
The agreement featured a provision that permitted Apple to impose a $25 million penalty on Goldman Sachs for every 90 days the launch of the Apple Card was delayed due to issues on their part. Just four days before the scheduled launch, it was found that essential systems for managing disputes were not fully functional due to technical problems, yet the rollout proceeded as expected.
Like a Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) program, the firms launched Apple Card Monthly Installments in December 2019, enabling customers to pay for a selection of Apple products in interest-free monthly installments.
However, the partnership between Goldman Sachs and Apple soon encountered severe problems. When customers reported incorrect charges or raised disputes, the systems did not resolve these issues effectively. According to federal law, financial institutions are required to investigate disputed transactions promptly. However, Goldman Sachs did not meet this obligation, and numerous disputes reported to Apple were not passed on to Goldman Sachs. Additionally, Apple’s promotional materials mistakenly led customers to believe they would get interest-free financing for Apple device purchases using their Apple Card. Still, many were charged interest without realizing it.
The Goldman Sachs CFPB probe looked into these matters and identified violations of the Truth in Lending Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Act. The CFPB’s findings revealed:
- Neglected investigation of disputes: For the disputes Apple did forward to Goldman Sachs, the bank often did not send acknowledgment notices within 30 days. It did not conduct thorough investigations or provide explanations of its findings within 90 days as required. This resulted in Goldman Sachs incorrectly placing damaging entries on consumers’ credit reports and making cardholders liable for charges that could be fraudulent or unauthorized.
- Unprocessed consumer disputes: Apple Card holders used a “Report an Issue” feature in the Wallet app to dispute transactions. In some cases, Apple asked customers via the Messages app for further details using a separate link. If customers did not complete the second form, Apple did not forward these disputes or issues to Goldman Sachs. Even after Goldman Sachs pointed out this issue, Apple failed to correct the flaw. As a result, cardholders were left to pay for contested purchases since neither Apple nor Goldman Sachs looked into tens of thousands of complaints.
- Misinformation regarding refunds: Over 10,000 cardholders using the Apple Card Monthly Installments plan, which maintained separate balances for the plan and a revolving interest-bearing balance, were misled by Goldman Sachs about how refunds would be applied between these balances. Contrary to what was promised, refunds for unrelated purchases were often credited to the interest-free plan balance, leading to unexpected interest charges for consumers.
- Deceptive marketing about payment plans: According to Apple’s promotion for the Apple Card Monthly Installments plan, customers who purchase Apple devices using their Apple Card would automatically be eligible for interest-free financing. However, because they were not immediately registered and faced perplexing options at checkout, many cardholders were unintentionally charged interest. The payment plan was only available to customers who used Apple’s Safari browser to make online purchases.
Chopra described the rollout as poorly executed, noting that essential systems for the Apple Card were not prepared in advance. The CFPB noted that the card was launched despite third-party warnings to Goldman Sachs about technological problems affecting its dispute system. The agency also stated that it would closely monitor Goldman Sachs’ future endeavors in the credit card market to prevent a recurrence of these issues.
Implications for the Banking Sector and Payment Systems
The Goldman Sachs CFPB probe taken recently serves as a vital reminder for the banking sector about the importance of compliance with regulatory standards. The penalties underscore financial institutions’ need to adhere strictly to consumer protection laws. A failure in compliance can result in significant financial penalties and operational constraints, highlighting the risks linked with non-compliance. Furthermore, mismanagement of customer disputes and disseminating misleading information can damage consumer trust. Trust is essential for sustaining customer relationships and preserving a brand’s reputation.
Banks must also ensure they have robust internal controls and oversight mechanisms. This is crucial to effectively managing partnerships and overseeing new product launches, ensuring that operations align with regulatory expectations and protecting consumer interests.
The implications extend to payment systems requiring efficient and transparent dispute resolution processes. Such processes are crucial for compliance and maintaining consumer trust in these platforms. Additionally, payment providers must communicate terms, especially concerning interest-free plans, to avoid confusion and potential regulatory issues. Clear and honest communication can prevent misunderstandings that lead to consumer dissatisfaction and attract regulatory scrutiny.
About Goldman Sachs
Established in 1869, the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is a prominent financial institution with global operations. It provides various financial services, including investment banking, securities, investment management, and consumer banking.
Goldman Sachs serves a diverse clientele, including corporations, financial institutions, governments, and individual investors. The company has its headquarters in New York and offices in major financial centers worldwide.
Conclusion
The Apple and Goldman Sachs CFPB probe highlights the risks and responsibilities of financial services partnerships, especially when customer service, compliance, and transparency are compromised. This case underscores the critical need for robust operational readiness and adherence to regulatory standards in any product launch, particularly in consumer credit.
For banks, maintaining consumer trust hinges on delivering clear, accurate information and having strong dispute-resolution processes. This enforcement reminds financial institutions that regulatory compliance is essential to sustaining long-term success and protecting customer relationships.
